<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>thebluebear dot-com &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebluebear.com/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebluebear.com</link>
	<description>Musings on dot-coms, user experience, music, and beyond…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:01:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Looking at FriendFeed&#8217;s today, envisioning a better future</title>
		<link>http://thebluebear.com/blog/looking-at-friendfeeds-today-envisioning-a-better-future/</link>
		<comments>http://thebluebear.com/blog/looking-at-friendfeeds-today-envisioning-a-better-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Onur Kabadayi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FriendFeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebluebear.com/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The debate on the success and future of FriendFeed has recently heated up on the tech blogger community. The debate concentrates on 3 main questions: &#8220;What are the problems of FriendFeed?&#8221;, &#8220;Can FriendFeed hit the mainstream like Facebook or twitter?&#8221;, and &#8220;Does FriendFeed have superior features to other social media platforms?&#8221;. Before addressing these, I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://friendfeed.com" target="_blank"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-489" title="Friendfeed Logo" src="http://thebluebear.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/friendfeed.png" alt="Friendfeed Logo" width="180" height="50" /></a>The debate on the success and future of <a href="http://friendfeed.com" target="_blank">FriendFeed</a> has recently heated up on the tech blogger community. The debate concentrates on 3 main questions: &#8220;What are the problems of FriendFeed?&#8221;, &#8220;Can FriendFeed hit the mainstream like Facebook or twitter?&#8221;, and &#8220;Does FriendFeed have superior features to other social media platforms?&#8221;. Before addressing these, I first want to focus on a more basic question:</p>
<h1><strong>What is FriendFeed?</strong></h1>
<p><strong> </strong> I totally agree on <a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/friendfeed-revenue" target="_blank">this view</a> that, in its core, “FriendFeed is a social bulletin board service&#8230; At the most basic level, FriendFeed is a forum&#8221;&#8230; However, FriendFeed&#8217;s strength lies at facilitating REAL TIME conversation around content. It&#8217;s a great tool to &#8220;listen&#8221; what&#8217;s happening around the world of social media. FriendFeed&#8217;s design enables content to go highly viral in no time.</p>
<p>Actually, feature-wise, FriendFeed is a lot like an &#8220;evolved&#8221; version of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4chan">4chan</a>, which is a highly popular bulletin board used by the geeky internet subcultures. Just like FriendFeed, 4chan is mostly composed of <a href="http://friendfeed.com/cannongod/dd18c5e5/friendfeed-4chan-for-grownups" target="_blank">picture memes &amp; topic bumps</a> (posts popping to the top of the page as people comment). Also like FriendFeed, 4chan is a highly viral environment: its community was responsible of many successful real-time coordinated attacks against other websites. Now, coming to other 3 questions&#8230;</p>
<h1><strong>What are the problems of FriendFeed?</strong></h1>
<p><strong> </strong> Robert Scoble has <a href="http://scobleizer.com/2009/07/09/facebook-up-10-twitter-up-16-friendfeed-flat/" target="_blank">a quite length post about this question</a>, I mostly agree on his points, but I will discuss ones that matter most for me:</p>
<p><strong> • Noise &amp; quality:</strong> Comments that don&#8217;t add value sometimes dominate FriendFeed, and result in noise. Noise easily gets amplified, and <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/28/friendfeeed-syphilis-and-the-perfection-of-online-mobs/" target="_blank">gets out of control</a>. User feeds and conversations may be dominated by few people. <strong><br />
• Usability &amp; control:</strong> The GUI is cluttered, and full of usability problems. Few features exist to control the user experience, and they require a lot of effort . You can’t display the front page with comments hidden, for instance.</p>
<p>Actually, FriendFeed has another major problem, which is much, much more essential than these two, but I want discuss this in the context of next question:</p>
<h1><strong>Can FriendFeed hit the mainstream like twitter?</strong></h1>
<p>My short answer is that, in its current form and direction, no. It will surely get more popular, but unless management realizes a new strategy, it will never get to the extent of Facebook or Twitter. Why?</p>
<p><strong>Friendfeed can&#8217;t hit the mainstream because, it simply lacks a &#8220;twist&#8221; &#8211; a powerful brand essence; and the current User Experience hinders its social value for masses</strong>. Let me clarify,  by taking a look at the popularization of 3 major social media platforms of the day:</p>
<p><strong>• </strong>Initially, <strong>MySpace</strong> successfully captivated alternative music bands as a place &#8220;<a href="http://www.danah.org/papers/FriendsterMySpaceEssay.html">to create identity and have a place to point fans to</a>&#8220;. Young fans followed, marked MySpace as &#8220;<strong>cool</strong>&#8220;, and created their own online identities.<strong><br />
• Facebook</strong>, successfully captivated the college students as a place to create identity, and gossip on each other asynchronously. The social value offered was relevant for everyone, and the student-only membership rule made it &#8220;<strong>charming</strong>&#8220;. So when they opened up the platform, it spread like a virus.<strong><br />
</strong><strong>•</strong> <strong>Twitter</strong>, successfully captivated mega-celebrities where they&#8217;ve seen it as a place to have a relationship and dialogue with their fans. Asthon Kucher and Oprah made twitter &#8220;<strong>trendy</strong>&#8220;, so <a href="http://www.sarahlacy.com/sarahlacy/2009/03/how-celebrities-are-bringing-twitter-to-the-common-people.html">masses followed</a>, and since the barrier to participate was little (140-characters) they realized that it&#8217;s a good tool to casually chat with acquaintances, and to meet new people.</p>
<p>On the other hand, which evengalist community FriendFeed captured? Tech early-adopters, bloggers, and geeks. It&#8217;s good to have these people on board, however, the problem is that the social value they get from FriendFeed isn&#8217;t replicating to masses.</p>
<p>Noise &amp; usability problems identified earlier perhaps don&#8217;t bother tech early-adopters, but it does most others. Furthermore, people usually perceive FriendFeed as an aggregator that is <a href="http://blog.tippingpointlabs.com/2009/07/friendfeed-struggles-as-a-channel-shows-promise-as-a-service/" target="_blank">mostly useful for heavy social media users</a>, so its potential user base becomes more narrow than most channels feeding into it.</p>
<p>And finally, FriendFeed lacks a “twist” in its brand ID – what made MySpace “cool” to the young, Facebook “charming” to the masses. FriendFeed is not attractive to celebs either, since they can’t yet brand &amp; customize their pages. So is FriendFeed crap? The answer lies at the following question:</p>
<h1>Does FriendFeed have superior features to other social media platforms?</h1>
<p>There are many things that FriendFeed does very well. It invented an absolutely magnificent way for listening to all the Internet&#8217;s social content in real-time. However, the problems I highlighted hinders FriendFeed&#8217;s growth, and giants like Facebook and Google easily mimick its functionality.</p>
<p>So where to go from here? FriendFeed needs  a two-folds strategy in order to have a better future.</p>
<p><strong>1. FriendFeed needs a serious User Experience re-design:</strong> Time to get professional <a href="http://adaptivepath.com">UX Consulting</a>, and create a much simpler and smarter GUI. While keeping the virality of the platform, the UX re-design must create mechanisms to effortlessly keep the monitered conversations in control. So I&#8217;m talking about the noise and spam, which will become more serious issues everyday. Also, serious brainstorming  must be made with regards to how to add the desperately needed &#8220;twist&#8221; into the FriendFeed&#8217;s brand.</p>
<p><strong>2. FriendFeed needs to also focus on the Business user by launching parallel services:</strong> In addition to tech early-adopters, I find that marketers increasingly use FriendFeed to keep the pulse of consumers and gather trends in real time. Furthermore, as the &#8220;<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/12/AR2009071200319.html" target="_blank">Social CRM</a>&#8221; concept gets more popular, businesses are increasingly willing to keep tabs on multiple social media channels.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a great opportunity for FriendFeed to be an invaluable tool for marketers and corporate social media staff to monitor (and publish to) various social media channels. I&#8217;m directly <a href="http://blog.tippingpointlabs.com/2009/07/friendfeed-struggles-as-a-channel-shows-promise-as-a-service/" target="_blank">quoting this</a> &#8220;Also, as companies develop more metrics to measure social media success, FriendFeed could offer premium services with comprehensive analytics and reporting&#8221;.</p>
<h1>Final Words&#8230;</h1>
<p>Today FriendFeed is a &#8220;niche&#8221; product, and with the current strategy, it&#8217;s destined to stay that way. It could be OK to be niche, however I&#8217;m not sure if FriendFeed could generate adaquate revenues that way. I&#8217;ve outlined my and others thoughts with regards to how it may have a better future.</p>
<p>Am I optimistic that the change is coming? Not quite, since one of the founders recently claimed that &#8220;<a href="http://ff.im/5kHbs" target="_blank">There is no doubt Friendfeed is the most advanced app on the Internet right now</a>&#8220;. FriendFeed could be a quite advanced application for today. However, to make the transition from good to great one needs to be very open-minded and sceptic, rather than arrogant&#8230;</p>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 846px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">
<p>Furthermore, FriendFeed lacks a &#8220;twist&#8221; in its brand ID &#8211;what made MySpace &#8220;cool&#8221; to the young, Facebook &#8220;charming&#8221; to the masses. It&#8217;s not attractive to celebs either, since they can&#8217;t yet brand &amp; customize their pages.</p></div>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/2867ac9a-572b-4719-a324-1d1971cac703/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=2867ac9a-572b-4719-a324-1d1971cac703" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thebluebear.com/blog/looking-at-friendfeeds-today-envisioning-a-better-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
